Linux

48186 readers

1475 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Longtime Debian user, looking to branch out. (lemmy.sdf.org)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by wesker@lemmy.sdf.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I use Debian flavors for my daily drivers. I have no complaints, no real desire to switch it up on that front.

However, I am starting to get into self-hosting and homelab projects. I'd like to start test driving some light-weight distros of a different flavor.

I'd prefer a GUI be available, but the environment and WM is pretty inconsequential-- except it shouldn't be bloated. I'll install any additional apps I want, I don't need a curated mid-to-heavy-weight distro.

The plan is to make heavy use of Docker images, to try to maintain a clean and modular setup of services. If that makes any difference.

Suggestions? Any slim distros you're just gaga for?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Arch is the best Debian alternative out there. They have archinstall now. It will speed up installation and will allow use of encrypted drive.

Since you want Docker, it works better on btrfs. Arch can do that on encrypted drive.

It is lightweight as far as you want to take it.

NixOS is a great light alternative, but i gave ip on it twice.

Manjaro if arch is too intimidating.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wait, what are the things Debian and Arch are alike?

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Apart from both being lightweight, they are more like opposites.

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Arch is good for home server, because you will not have to do major update ever again and because at home one usually doesn’t mind restarting after updating.

Debian is a good option for private virtual server on the cloud. Because Debian is frequently an option there, while Arch is not an option due to its rolling nature. Debian supposedly can update without restart, but I never trusted that.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Since you want Docker, it works better on btrfs.

Can you elaborate?

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Docker images are immutable and if you run lots of images there will be overlap of commonly used layers.

Docker has BTRFS driver, which will efficiently reuse layers on BTRFS.

Basically, there’s good chance to waste less drive space with Docker on BTRFS.