this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
45 points (92.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40246 readers
563 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
45
Is rsync.net a good service for backups? (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by fart_pickle@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been playing around with the self hosted apps for quite a while and I got to the point where I'm happy about my local setup. Next step is to setup reliable offsite backup. I'm using borgbackup as a tool to manage my backups (so far only local backups). I've been looking for an affordable yet reliable service to store my backups. Is rsync.net worth it? According to the "internet" it's a good service but wanted to double check. What do you think about it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] verstra@programming.dev 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

I've opened up the pricing page, and it seems it is much more expensive then their mainstream competitor Backblaze. For a terabyte of backup for a month, rsync.net would charge 1024*0.012 = 12$, while Backblaze would charge 6$. Hetzner Storage Box would be only 3.20$ (+better price scaling over terabytes).

What am I missing?

Sources:

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Note that rsync.net includes free 7 days daily snapshot. Also, the main advantage over backblaze b2 for me is you can just sync a whole folder full of small files instead of compressing them into an archive first prior to uploading to a b2 bucket. This means you can access individual files later without the need to download the whole archive.

I still use b2 to store long term backup archives though.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hetzner also supports snapshots and you can upload files uncompressed.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I haven't actually tried it though so I'm not sure how it compares with rsync.net. How easy it is to access snapshots on hetzner? On rsync.net, snapshots are stored under .zfs folder so it's very easy to access.

[–] Mora@pawb.social 2 points 7 months ago

You turn the visibility in the web interface on and then you can browse them as well.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

I don't know from the top of my head and I can't check right now.

load more comments (3 replies)