this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

Linux Gaming

15264 readers
68 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
monolalia@lemmy.world
40
How are you all partitioning your setup? (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by million@lemmy.world to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have 2 drives in my machine. Linux right now is installed on 1/4 of the first drive and I am going to start moving parts of my 2nd drive, which is just games on Windows, to a 1/2 combo of NTFS and BTRFS. Essentially giving Linux more space as it replaces Windows as my gaming daily driver. With the eventual plan to move that entire 2nd drive over to BTRFS, and allow Windows to have 3/4 of the 1st drive for games that only run under it.

Curious how folks have set this up. Currently I have Steam, Heroic and Lutris installing to ~/Games. So it may make sense to mount my new drive there, but I am not sure that in home folder mounts make sense. I also realize I could potentially use BTRFS to make it look like my space is all one mount point vs multiple, but given the complexity of that filesystem I am worried there is a downside I am not aware of.

Any suggestions? What has worked for you for your setup?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't recommend it, but my current setup is I reach into the computer, unplug one SSD and plug in the other. Not the most high-tech dual boot but yeah

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't you just configure your BIOS to boot from one or the other? I've never had Windows care about drives it's not configured to use.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Probably could, but it's not worth the time or effort. I switch so rarely that even if it only took five minutes to configure, that's still more time than I spend switching in six months

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There shouldn't be any configuration, you just push F11 or whatever and select the other boot drive. I still do that when I boot into Windows like once/year.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'd assumed you'd read my other comment. When I do have both drives plugged in at once, Windows always does a disk check on every startup, which takes a long time and is completely unnecessary. Just switching which device I boot from isn't a good solution for my computer

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

As mentioned, I've never had that issue. I put the Windows disk in whichever slot it prefers and Linux in another, then configure the BIOS to prefer the Linux drive.

I think it's doing the disk check because it's in a different slot than it expects or something.

[–] UnhappyCamper@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why not switch between the drives in the bios when you want to use the other?

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago

I can't leave them both plugged in because Windows keeps complaining that my drive is damaged and it needs to run a disk check. The reason I don't set up grub or something else properly is mainly laziness. I use one OS for a project that lasts several months at a time so I don't switch between them that often. It's just not worth the time or effort to save two minutes every few months