this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
103 points (87.1% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
562 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
103
DuckDuckAssitant is back! (media.kbin.social)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Facni@kbin.social to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Dude, there is degoogled chromium, and various other blink engine choices, but touting brave as a "superior" option? Oof. Big oof.

On the gecko side of things, there are a ton of great choices as well. All of them are better in every single way than brave.

[–] ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because it objectively IS. It passes privacy tests in so many areas where others fail and I'm not just talking about those privacy test sites, I'm talking tests we can run ourselves. It's fine if you don't like Brave but don't let your emotions get in the way of the fact that it is, by default, the best option for privacy out of the box. Sure, you CAN harden Firefox or use Librewolf but even those don't always succeed in passing those tests like Brave does.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Bro. Be better.

"Objectively"

"Superior"

Your use of these words make me think that you don't understand what they mean. Go ahead, use brave all you want. Big oof.

[–] ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It IS. It's a fact. You can run the tests yourself.