this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
91 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

10027 readers
1476 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • More than one-third of the allegations against suspended officers involved gender-based violence including sexual assault, intimate partner violence and sexual harassment.
  • The majority (87 per cent) of suspensions were accompanied by a criminal charge.
  • Nearly half of all officers suspended and convicted of a crime returned to work. Just under one in 10 were fired.
  • The vast majority were constables, but all ranks were represented including chiefs and deputy chiefs.
  • Eleven officers were suspended multiple times during the past decade.

This is all incredibly embarrassing and infuriating.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 year ago

And your list of allegations points out another problem.

I can understand insulating police officers to some extent from criminal charges incurred in the line of duty while the court process is taking place, because the nature of their job is going to mean that they get hit with more than the average number of charges for things like assault that end up not panning out . . . but there's no way intimate partner violence should be occurring in the line of duty for police, and they should not be protected from it. (Given extra mental health supports in a bid to avoid it, sure, but once it happens they need to be treated like everyone else.)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These are the things that really bother me. Not that they're not left without income while under being tried/reviewed. If it's easier to fire the bad apples, the money spent on them doing nothing would be less as well.