this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
91 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
393 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • More than one-third of the allegations against suspended officers involved gender-based violence including sexual assault, intimate partner violence and sexual harassment.
  • The majority (87 per cent) of suspensions were accompanied by a criminal charge.
  • Nearly half of all officers suspended and convicted of a crime returned to work. Just under one in 10 were fired.
  • The vast majority were constables, but all ranks were represented including chiefs and deputy chiefs.
  • Eleven officers were suspended multiple times during the past decade.

This is all incredibly embarrassing and infuriating.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 7 months ago

And your list of allegations points out another problem.

I can understand insulating police officers to some extent from criminal charges incurred in the line of duty while the court process is taking place, because the nature of their job is going to mean that they get hit with more than the average number of charges for things like assault that end up not panning out . . . but there's no way intimate partner violence should be occurring in the line of duty for police, and they should not be protected from it. (Given extra mental health supports in a bid to avoid it, sure, but once it happens they need to be treated like everyone else.)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

These are the things that really bother me. Not that they're not left without income while under being tried/reviewed. If it's easier to fire the bad apples, the money spent on them doing nothing would be less as well.