this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
478 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (14 children)

You can use any Matrix client with Beeper, you don't have to use theirs.

Regardless, there's nothing stopping you from recreating the same stack using the available tools.

What makes their service unique are the bridges. Download their sources, compile them, and then pair them with any server client combo you want.

If you insist on using their stack, you can still use an OSS client. They chose not to make their client open source as it is, by design, for their service only.

They're trying to run a business aimed at people who don't care about open source, and want the same closed source experience they get from their other chat apps but with inter connectivity between third party services.

If you want the latter without any closed source code, you can just go and do that. They've released all the important parts.

Edit: Here's a guide to self hosting beeper.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (13 children)

What is this "closed source experience" you are talking about? How would making the client open source hinder that in any way, especially when their stated goal is to earn money with premium features instead of the app itself?!

Imo being open source is a VERY big deal for an e2e encrypted chat client! I don't really care whether most of their stack is open if the app I'm actually using to type and encrypt my messages is not. This makes the whole thing look like a trick, pretending to be open when key parts are not.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Just use any open source client. You can literally do that.

And if you don't trust the company - for any reason - use their code to deploy your own backend.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That's not the point. An app doesn't become good because you can just not use it.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I disagree. Beeper's client is meaningless, it's the service being offered that has value.

If you don't mind trusting a third party service with your Matrix instance + bridge hosting, use Beeper.

If you're into OSS and owning your own tech stack, self host the whole thing.

At no point do you have to use their client for any reason.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The thing is, we are talking about the Beeper service here. Yes Matrix is good, yes Beeper bridges are good, but a closed source Beeper app is bad. That's what the criticism is about, and it doesn't help if you deflect that by arguing about all the other things they are doing or that no one is forced to install it.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fair point, if you're just against the fact that they wrote a closed source client.

It's frustrating that closed source software exists, but in this context I'm (personally) okay with it as it funds the development of free software.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You're definitely right that people are a bit too doom-and-gloom about it, Beeper did do a lot of good over the last few years!

But I also find it a bit odd that they talk so much about the importance of open source in messaging, and then release a closed source client without at least adressing the topic. Add the fact that they've been aquired by another company on the same day, and it starts to smell like another instance of openwashing.

Idk, we'll have to see how it plays out I guess.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 3 points 7 months ago

I am worried about that acquisition, to be honest.

I've been supporting them via Github sponsors for about a year, now - as I only use their open source software; I've no intention of touching the service or closed source client.

As a result, I'd be lying if I didn't say I was anxious about their new owners basically telling them "hey, why are you releasing all your bridges for free, anyway?"

Really hope that doesn't happen, as their bridges have been my primary communication channels for a long time, now. I love not having to keep WhatsApp or Discord installed on my phone.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)