this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
35 points (94.9% liked)
PC Gaming
8573 readers
287 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The problem with Arc cards is that they are a great budget option but don't work on budget computers. I was planning on pairing an arc 380 with a i7 6700k for a little budget gaming machine but the card doesn't work without ReBar. So who are these cards for? Who is pairing a $100-200 GPU with a $200 cpu?
I don't know how they plan to compete in the budget market if people are better off buying an 8 year old GTX 1060 then they are buying a new arc card.
Intel seemed to fall behind kinda hard w/ regards to CPU/Motherboard features until much later on. Supposing you aren't working with parts you already have, everything from 1st generation Ryzen onwards would have rebar support. They can be had very cheaply too, and work on any AM4 board.
You may also find a BIOS update allows some older chipsets to support rebar. It's a tad flaky depending on the manufacturer though.
There is a hack to get ReBar on those older machines. I have a 6700k as well and it's running a 1050ti, but this utility I heard about allows any modern system running a UEFI to have ReBar.
They didn't WANT to make budget cards. They wanted mid/high end cards but fell short. But it's better to sell at a lower price then to completely eat the cost for hardware they already made.
Alchemist is barely more than a proof of concept. Until they got DirectX to Vulkan translation really going, the performance in a lot of titles was kind of a joke.
A gen 1 product only ever makes sense in hyper-specific use-cases, but a lot of the pieces for something really neat and much more widely useful, are there.
Alchemist cards weren't gamechangers. But they've proved that with time and some more RnD, ARC can be.