this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
437 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37728 readers
662 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago (7 children)

42, 47, and 50 all make sense to me. What’s the significance of 37, 57, and 73?

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

People do mention Veritasium, though he doesn't give any significant explanation of the phenomenon.

I still wonder about 47. In Veritasium plots, all these numbers provide a peak, but not 47. I recall from my childhood that I indeed used to notice that number everywhere, but idk why.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

47 does provide a peak in the plots though? All the numbers ending in 7 do.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)