this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
295 points (97.4% liked)

Linux Gaming

15250 readers
62 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] loo@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

My main issue with this blog post is that rather than properly addressing concerns, they make fun of them.

It's not a rootkit, journalists just spread misinformation for clicks

Why is it not a rootkit, then??

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A blog toxic as it's community? Gasp.

A long while back riot used to be a fun sorta disruptive thing that was pretty healthy overall. It was awkward and fun. That was before it was purchased though. Now riot exists to make money for big china. It isn't that company anymore. It's a facade.

You can't fix it, nor can the employees.

Riot is a skinpuppet that has no autonomy. Unlike the employees though, we have the choice to leave that failing franchise and move on. Rootkits aren't acceptable and that needs to be the standard. It wasn't okay when Sony tried it in the name of anti-piracy and it's still not okay now. No person should be okay with installing a black box with greater admin rights than they have on their own machine. That is not okay. It is security heresy. That blog uses hand waving and bullshit to sell the concept to people that don't know any better. And honestly? That's almost just as bad as the rootkit itself.

A rough translation is:

Be a good drone and put the slave collar on. It's good for you. Don't ask questions, you don't need to know why. Just do it. You are the product and you have no rights.

[–] slumberlust@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I disagree that they went downhill post-purchase. They were shit from the very start when pendragon decided to burn one community to promote his own in the name of capitalism.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

They had their issues, sure. But most studios will have burned bridges in their wake. Not a hard and fast rule of course.

When I refer to downhill I'm looking directly at the slippery slope that is changing from profit as a target to profit above all else. When you sell a company regardless of who you retain - there will be a value shift as the head drives the body. The existing cracks got worse and new ones formed. People that care the most generally give up, leave, or both and the whole thing falls in on the void left by those support's absences.

You may be right that a shift in ideal started then. I'm not terribly familiar with the story so I'll defer to you on that.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guess the difference is in whether or not the victim was complicit with installing spyware in the kernel.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

If that's the distinction they're going with, they don't actually know what a rootkit is and have no business declaring something is or isn't one

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Because journalists.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

because on windows it's not considered a rootkit, it's considered user obscured feature sets.