this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
74 points (94.0% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3202 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"He then pointed to the red 'Tesla Vehicle Charging Only' signs and insisted that it was ILLEGAL for me to be there and that he was CALLING THE POLICE! I was taken aback by his extreme reaction," the Rivian driver writes.

Just like Muskrat to sell access to his chargers but leave up the sign sthat only Tesla's can use them.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

They have Tesla branding. But it looks like the sign is intended to read "vehicle charging only", as in, "don't take this spot just to park".

The logo is too close, so I understand the confusion. But I don't think that's how the sign is intended to be read.