this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
81 points (94.5% liked)
PC Gaming
8576 readers
234 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I haven't particularly felt mine is underpowered tbh. Obviously it's a handheld so it doesn't play the AAA graphics card melters on ultra haha. But yes, introducing a new one would affect everyone who doesn't upgrade... Plus of course the benchmark being low benefits PC players with weaker hardware, too. Budget players, in other words, who perhaps can't afford a £500+ upgraded deck. Seems a bit cold to just throw these folks under the bus.
That's the issue with bottom specced hardware. It's not future proof. It's falls out of the window of acceptable performance much faster. Look at the Horizon games. Zero Dawn plays great, Forbidden West does not.
At the bottom spec like the deck is, a two or three year refresh cadence is expected, unless they get to the point it hits in the middle of the performance window and has more leeway.
Yes, and that is exactly why having a low spec device as a common performance benchmark is useful. It extends the lifespan of low spec devices in general - at least if publishers think it's worth targeting the playerbase.
I fully agree. But that low spec benchmark needs to move up regularly to be useful.