this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
32 points (94.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5240 readers
368 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
32
New York’s First Electric Skyscraper Promises Luxury With Lower Emissions | An apartment tower in downtown Brooklyn has ditched fossil fuel heating and appliances (www.bloomberg.com)
submitted 7 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huginn@feddit.it 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you don't build shitty apartments for the rich they'll just gentrify poor areas.

More housing is more housing.

[–] Mikufan@ani.social -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is just BS as most apartments in skyscrapers are empty in general because not even rich people want to own that shit.

How about that(above image) and good public transport?

[–] huginn@feddit.it 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is downtown Brooklyn - NYC. Building the apartments in your image would lower density where this skyscraper is being built.

Luxury buildings in downtown Brooklyn are not for the super rich - they're for the 1%ers who work at banks downtown, and will almost certainly be rental units which are pretty constantly booked.

You don't get how housing constrained NYC is.

[–] Mikufan@ani.social -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lower density isn't the problem with affordable housing and public transport.

The skyscrapers are not good, they never are.

Get public transport.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We're talking about Brooklyn NY

Do you know a single thing about Brooklyn NY?

Cause you don't sound like you know a single thing about Brooklyn NY. Or about what it means to be housing constrained.

[–] Mikufan@ani.social -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you know what public transport is?

[–] huginn@feddit.it 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ok so you don't know what you're talking about.

I live in Brooklyn. While the transit could use some expansions it's not only the best transit system in the USA it also has the most subway stations of any transit system on earth.

If that hasn't fixed housing affordability what's your proposed solution?

What's that? Oh density? Ok cool glad we agree. Let's build skyscrapers.

[–] Mikufan@ani.social -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The best public transport in usa is still shit compared to Europe... And density increase isn't the way to go.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 3 points 7 months ago

Mai sei mai andato a Roma? Vissi sia a Roma che a Napoli e nessun parte del trasporto pubblico è di qualità simile a quello di NYC. Nessun. Parte.

Scemo.

Fuck off troll.