this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
76 points (81.1% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (5 children)

"Absolutely Terrifying"

Really? Did he watch the same video I saw on that page? That b-roll was really bad.

I get that it'll only get better, but generative AI models will never understand filmmaking techniques because it can't. That's not how these models are built.

It can create a city skyline and pan right, but it'll never know why a pan right in that scene was appropriate or how the lighting fits in with the rest of the scene. It'll never come up with new ways of "filming" a scene, because it's all built on what already exists. There's no style to generative AI.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You say that like the current models are the end of the line but understanding why film making techniques are used isn't impossible even just for a llm based system. Designing new styles isn't out of reach for ai either, sure you can God of the gaps it and say there's a mysterious sliver of soul required but practically it'll be able to be every bit as original as any human, probably more so as it has more knowledge to work from.

I know it's desirable to hate on ai because it's scary or popular but nailing your colors to the argument that it'll never be able to do certain things is already an exhausting game of moving that goalpost every time a new model emerges and that's only going to continue.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

it’ll be able to be every bit as original as any human, probably more so as it has more knowledge to work from.

It'll be so "original" that it makes no sense, evokes no emotion, and goes nowhere.

And if the goalpost is a decent movie, then the goalpost hasn't moved at all. AI is just impossibly far away.

Perhaps most importantly does humanity actually want to build bigger and bigger supercomputers using more and more electricity/resources just so some AI can make a crappy action movie? What a waste.

[–] hikaru755@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

AI is just impossibly far away.

Sure it's pretty far away, but it's also moving at break neck speed. Last year low-res spaghetti-eating Will Smith body horror was the pinnacle of ai generated video, today we're already generating videos that take at least a second look to determine that it was AI generated. The big question is at what point that improvement rate will start to level off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)