Technology

59377 readers

4734 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

579

Mercedes becomes the first automaker to sell autonomous cars in the U.S. that don't come with a requirement that drivers watch the road (fortune.com)

submitted 7 months ago by MichaelTen@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

229 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

In this case the responsibility to pay will ultimately fall on everyone, not just on the pedestrian getting hit. Still not good, but you won't be SOL.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If these have lidar (unlike teslas) then they might be better at detecting obstructions but I feel like real world road conditions are not kind to cameras and sensors.

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Fixed lidar sensors are not as reliable as it’s made out to be, unfortunately. Dome lidar systems like those found on Waymo vehicles are pretty good, but way more advanced (and expensive) than anything you’d find in consumer vehicles at the moment. The shadows of trees are enough to render basic lidar sensors useless, as they effectively produce an aperiodic square wave of infrared light (from the sun) that is frequently inseparable from the ToF emission signal. Sunsets are also sometimes enough to completely blind lidar sensors.

None of this is to say that Tesla’s previous camera-only approach was a good idea, like at all. More data is always a good thing, so long as the system doesn’t rely on the data more than the data’s reliability permits. After all, cameras can be blinded by sunlight too. IMO radar is the best economical complementary sensor to cameras at the moment. Despite the comparatively low accuracy, they are very reliable in adverse conditions.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

been hit before, not buying it. gonna be proactive about self defense.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've been hit 4 times

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

then you know destroying these fucking things is self defense.