this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
197 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59323 readers
4559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This seems like a better candidate for AI, GPUs are just to energy inefficient.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Would it still be AI if it gains its own intelligence?

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

Probably depends on our part in its emergence. If we purposely set it on a path that we think ends there, I would still call it artificial. If it emerges through a process unknown and unintended by us, I wouldn't.

[–] CazzoBuco@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That compares a whole human vs. A graphics card. If you only have connected brain cells, I imagine that it would be much cheaper than having to sustain a whole body.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 6 months ago

It's a pretty horrifying article tbh. The assumptions and conclusions it's making if you just start asking yourself how you actually save that energy should be obvious.