Books are still one of the most important sources of information we have as a human species. However, the media on which this information has been stored has changed considerably over time and with it its accessibility and influence on our society.

Nowadays you can find an enormous range of books and texts online. Most of the time, however, access to them is extremely fragmented, difficult to find, subject to a fee, incompatible with the software platform of your choice or, in the worst case, goes under with its provider over time.

To counteract this, annas-archive was founded to make the knowledge stored in the texts and books openly accessible and to preserve it for future generations. On the other hand, there are platforms such as Goodreads that aim to simplify the joy of reading and the exchange of information, as well as the review and discussion of books and texts.

Unfortunately, Goodreads is a centralized, proprietary solution that in addition also happens to be owned by Amazon. BookWyrm is a decentralized, open source alternative in the fediverse that steps in right here.

Now here's the kicker: what if we combined the power of both platforms? What if we combined the enormous book database of annas-archive with the fediverse, i.e. BookWyrm? Annas archive could benefit from reviews and discussions about the books and BookWyrm could expand its still very limited database many times over.

From my point of view, this would be the perfect combination of two already great projects. What do you think?

TL:DR What do you think about combining annas-archive with the fediverse (BookWyrm)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PropaGandalf@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't see much of a difference to Goodreads. You will find most of the features you already use on bookwyr including book lists, reading goals and book info. It's up to you to decide if you want to sgare these info with everyone, just your friends or keep them for yourself. There are a lot of lists that are public too so don't worry about that.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are a lot of lists that are public too so don’t worry about that.

Cool, but if I need an account to see them then they're not really public. Maybe it's me but I did not see any link to any actual open content. If you could point me to one I'd be happy to look again.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you could point me to one I’d be happy to look again.

Try this.

BookWyrm is designed to be a replacement for Goodreads, so it operates in a fairly similar way.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That IS very similar to Goodreads, and then I was able to follow a random reviewer link to more content to browse. Thank you.