this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
1482 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

10003 readers
578 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The Bay Area is a well known warp in reality. Don't expect your experiences there to map to experiences elsewhere.

And even so, it's usually who you know, how well you can sell to VC, and luck that determine success out there.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

:) good point. Can be a nice reality warp, for the non-super commuters who can enjoy the weather by the Bay/Pacific.

Edited in an obvious miss:

Edit: I forgot, the argument could easily be “the vast majority of high earners got there by job hopping”!

Luck really helps too. Pretty much a necessity.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A good point on the luck aspect, and you reminded me of the fact that people who already have money have "better luck" in the respect that they have more opportunities to try new things.

It's like one of those carnival games where you throw darts at balloons. Middle-class kids might get one or two darts while wealthy kids get 10. And the poor kids are the ones working at the carnival.

Something like 20% of businesses fail in their first year, and 80% are gone by year 5. If you can afford to start 5 different businesses, your odds of one surviving long enough to get bought up by Google or something are much better than somebody who put their life savings into their company.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Absolutely!

We built some proof for the darts phenomenon in an economics class. Professor gave everyone a certain number of pieces of candy. Everyone was allowed to trade for a while, then we counted candy at the end. (Might’ve been stipulations on how trades worked, can’t recall). As you’d imagine, any kid who started with 10 pieces of candy ended with more candy than any kid who started with 3 pieces. Powerful example 🍭