this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
447 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2968 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tick_Dracy@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As someone who’s not following 🇺🇸 news, what does that (Hilary) part means?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There's a conspiracy theory (not entirely without merit, but generally assumed to be baseless) that people with negative information about the Clintons end up dead suspiciously. Epstein was one such person, under this theory.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why didn’t they kill Monica? This conspiracy theory is actual garbage.

Both of the Clintons are garbage human beings who didn’t/don’t deserve to be in office (which is true of most politicians). Bill definitely coerced women into sex. But when the loudest critics of the Clintons are tinfoil loons, it takes all of the air out of the room.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That's the biggest hole in the theory for me. If they're willing to disappear people, there are a lot of people they seem to have missed.

There's a sort of counter theory that says that the Clintons themselves started the conspiracy theory as a way of putting all Clinton dissent under the heading of a conspiracy, and honestly I find that much more believable.

[–] Tick_Dracy@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for explaining.

I never heard of that. and for the Eipstein, I always associated his info with powerful people, but not specifically with the Clintons ಠ_ಠ

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Right, there are a lot of possible names to blame for Epstein for sure. Like I said, it's a theory that's largely considered to be baseless. The Clintons have a lot of faults, but I haven't seen any indication that they're into assassinations.