this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
561 points (98.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21226 readers
72 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    561
    You shouldn't ignore it (lemmy.world)
    submitted 6 months ago by Waffelson@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 61 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Windows constantly says "this could harm your computer." Just about any time you install software it does.

    Remember when Linus Sebastian blew up Pop!_OS? As a Windows user, "This is likely to break your computer, do not do this unless you absolutely know what you're doing. To proceed, type "Yes, do as I say."" is something to walk right past.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    Damn so thats why he ignored the warning... I never understood how he could write Yes, do as I say! by ignoring the obvious warning.

    It seemed like he intentionally brick the system just to complain linux is bad

    [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I've done big forensic write-ups of it in the past and mapped it to the FAA's accident chain model. It just so happened that he was using a distro with a weird forked DE (Pop!_OS) and just so happened that the version of the Steam package in the apt cache from when the install image was made was bugged in such a way that it would uninstall Xorg, and it just so happened that Pop!_OS didn't run an apt update when launching their GUI app manager.

    When Linus saw "failed to install Steam" he turned the petulant child up to 11 and started bitching about how you always have to use the terminal in Linux, and instead of googling the error message to find out "do an update and try again" he found a page that told him how to sudo apt install steam. Most instructions like that tell you do to an apt update before an apt install, so I don't know if he either aggressively skimmed, deliberately ignored the update command because he's used to how painful Windows updates are, or if he found a source that didn't include it.

    APT spat out a lot of stdout about all the packages it was going to remove, with a highlighted plaintext warning at the end which he failed to read or failed to heed.

    Linus' bad attitude was a major contributing factor to the incident.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I too wrote something similiar here https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9956561

    But didn't expect it was Windows mentality to ignore all hazardous warnings

    [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

    I think it played a part.