this post was submitted on 05 May 2024

1492 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59219 readers

3145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1492

Is Boeing in big trouble? World's largest aerospace firm faces 10 more whistleblowers after sudden death of two (www.hindustantimes.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Dragxito@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

298 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

sadfsdfasfasf

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

So in other words, very plausible deniability.

https://allthatsinteresting.com/heart-attack-gun

We had that tech in 1968. I'm pretty sure it would be a matter of a phone call and some change from the couch cushions for Boeing to create the recent outcome.

Does this mean they did it? No.

Does it warrant the reaction folks are having about it? Absolutely yes. (Edit - In light of their current troubles and the fate of the prior whistleblower.)

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

which could cause death in minutes without leaving a trace.

Aside from the puncture wound.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

From the article:

All that would be left behind was a tiny red dot where the dart entered the body, undetectable to those who didn’t know to look for it.

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Which can be missed by an examiner

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

sadfsdfasfasf

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well that’s it. Case closed. The existence of a heart attack gun in 1968 proves Boeing killed 2 whistleblowers in 2024. Good job gang.

Literally no one has made that statement, including me, the guy who brought up the heart attack gun. Take a breath man.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

sadfsdfasfasf

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Plonk.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 7 points 6 months ago

They may have ironed that out, this article is talking about tech that is more than half a century old. We got from first aeroplane to man on the moon in less than that.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

sadfsdfasfasf

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Does this mean they did it? No.

Does it warrant the reaction folks are having about it? Absolutely yes. (Edit - In light of their current troubles and the fate of the prior whistleblower.)

I stand by that statement, and don't feel like trying again to connect the dots on the relevancy of my example for you. Whatever you are arguing about is - not the same.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

sadfsdfasfasf

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And it is suspected that thousand of elderly people are murdered every year, but it is ruled as a natural death, because the demographic is prone to natural deaths and nobody bothers to check further.

At the very least demanding a throughout investigation in both cases is absolutely reasonable.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

sadfsdfasfasf