this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
317 points (91.8% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2135 readers
14 users here now

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Star Wars Disney Plus shows should move away from Jedi-centric stories and explore other aspects of the Star Wars universe
  • Andor is a successful example of a Star Wars show without Jedi, focusing on the Empire's control and morally gray characters
  • Suggestions for new Star Wars show ideas include Pod Racing, Jawa Storage Wars, and One Man and His Droid, among others
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slurpyslop@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

if where you draw the line on what counts as integral to a narrative is that arbitrary, why not just toss jedi too?

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

if where you draw the line on what counts as integral to a narrative is that arbitrary, why not just toss jedi too?

Just because you declare it as arbitrary doesn't mean it's actually arbitrary.

If you ask most people on the street what is the most iconic thing about Star Wars, they would either tell you Force wielders, or Jedi/Sith.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] slurpyslop@kbin.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just because you declare it as arbitrary doesn’t mean it’s actually arbitrary.

either you're defining star wars by the films, or you're picking and choosing what really "counts"

you're doing the latter

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just because you declare it as arbitrary doesn’t mean it’s actually arbitrary.

either you’re defining star wars by the films, or you’re picking and choosing what really “counts”

you’re doing the latter

No, I've watched pretty much everything at this point, and have read the EU books to boot (really enjoy some of them).

And I remember the decades of TV news/videos and publication stories/articles about what makes Star Wars, Star Wars.

I'd feel confident if you put it up to a vote, that the Force and/or Jedi/Sith is the primary response to the question "What is Star Wars to you?". Everything else is just copying other stuff and slapping a sci-fi paint on it. Traveller TTRPG like.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] slurpyslop@kbin.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the eu is filled with stories that aren't about jedi or the force

so yeah, you're picking and choosing what counts based on your personal vibes

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

so yeah, you’re picking and choosing what counts based on your personal vibes

Disagree, and moving on. Have a good one.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why not just watch one of the many other options without Jedi?

The rule of two is hardly integral, anyways. There were 3 for most of the prequel trilogy time frame and Vader took on several apprentices between ep 3 and 4. It was 2 as far as I know during the OT but then the sequels brought it back to 3.

And Sideous adopted the rule of one (where he can train whoever he wants but not with the intent of replacing him because he planned on living forever using force ghost and clones so he'd always have a body) from the end of ep 1 onwards.

I just speak for myself, but star wars without force users just isn't that interesting to me.

[–] slurpyslop@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

then why not watch one of the many other options with jedi?