Technology

59219 readers

2836 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

497

Novel attack against virtually all VPN apps neuters their entire purpose (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

133 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Efforts have been put in for several decades now

I still remember all the hype around "IPv6" day about 12 years ago...

Any day now...

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I'm on a IPv6 provider (with CGNAT for IPv4-only services) and everything works fine.

I think people are just lazy.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it's laziness, it's financial incentive—there's not much demand for something that might be quite a lot of work from a lot of companies' perspectives.

Hell, IIRC AWS only started supporting IPv6 completely on the cloud service that hosts a huge percentage of the internet's traffic about 3 years ago

I'm a little curious about your situation though—with regards to the CGNAT, does everyone on your ISP effectively share one (or a small pool of) IPv4 address(es)? Do you ever see issues with IP restrictions? (e.g. buying tickets for events, etc)

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Luckily I haven't noticed any restrictions.

My provider uses the same IPv4 for four different customers, and it lets each one of them use a different range of 12000 ports each (of course, the random user on ports 1-12000 is the "luckiest" one because he could theoretically host a website on port 80 or 443).

But this means I can expose my Torrent client or Plex or any other services on a custom port, directly forwarded.

It works really well in my experience. The provider is Free (France).

[–] ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

CGNAT is certainly becoming a real issue. In the UK at least legacy providers have millions of IP addresses in the bank and new disruptive providers do not have access to these except at extremely inflated rates.

When I changed one of these new disruptive providers I was unaware that CGNat would be imposed and all of my security cameras were no longer accessible. Fortunately they did move me off CGNat when I asked but they said it may not be forever.

Like always I don't think this will be dealt with in any speedy capacity, unless we get lucky and some correctly positioned legislator can't do what they want to do with their internet connection. Then it might get expedited.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Let's hope that the EU steps in. It's the only institution in which I have some faith left in...

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago

Czech Republic is doing the most promising thing right now I think: https://konecipv4.cz/en/

I hope the EU or at least other countries will follow.