Gaming

30555 readers

470 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

Whom@beehaw.org

The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

chloyster@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

Can somebody explain why game makers don't start their own companies together? (programming.dev)

submitted 6 months ago by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/gaming@beehaw.org

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It seems like every other week a game studio is massively laying off employees; sometimes after years of development. What I'm reading is that it's a quick way to lower expenses and pad the investors' pockets, flooding the market with developers and reducing their value, to then hire them back a few months later at lower salaries.

So, what's holding back gamedevs from banding together to either unionize or start their own companies with better conditions that the purely money-driven studios? Why aren't they trying to be better? Nobody willing to invest in them? Does starting a company together mean they will now be the bosses who have to answer to the investors, ensure returns, and fire employees? Is the world just an entire shit-cake?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Employee owned companies are more stable in economic downturns but they also require much more diversification to replace the owner/manager roles where there is actually shit to do. Big item being the book keeping it's simple enough in theory but in practice even smaller companies can take hours just to understand where you're starting from.

[–] Seraph@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not following on why manager roles are different from traditional companies.

The book keeping? You mean splitting the profit? Why wouldn't you assume everyone has a % stake?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Not splitting the profits, tracking bills, making sure they're all paid on time, making sure the company is getting paid on time depending on your business plan, tracking any special taxes you gotta pay, tracking price increases in long term contracts, list goes on

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago

I'm a better bookkeeper than I am a coder. I would join.

So many roles can be fractionalized that it seems doable.

Strategic leadership and consensus might be difficult. Design by committee could be the biggest enemy.