this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
1714 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59295 readers
5011 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Were in a capitalist system and these are for-profit companies, right? What do you think their goal is. It isn't to help you. It's to increase profits. That will probably lead to massive amounts of jobs replaced with AI and we will get nothing for giving them the data to train on. It's purely parasitic. You should not advocate for it.

If it's open and not-for-profit, it can maybe do good, but there's no way this will.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why can’t they increase profits, by you know, making the product better.

Do they have to make things shitter to save money and drive away people thus having to make it more shitter.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If they make it better that may increase profits temporarily, as they draw customers away from competitors. Once you don't have any competitors then the only way to increase profits is to either decrease expenses or increase revenue. Increasing revenue is limited if you're already sucking everything you can.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And is it wrong to stop at a certain amount of profit.

Why they always want more. I ain’t that greedy.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

To us? No, it isn't wrong. To them? Absolutely. You don't becoming a billionaire by thinking you can have enough. You don't dominate a market while thinking you don't need more.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Meta and Google have done more for open source ai than anyone else, I think a lot of antis don't really understand how computer science works so you imagine it's like them collecting up physical iron and taking it into a secret room never to be seen again.

The actual tools and math is what's important, research on best methods is complex and slow but so far all these developments are being written up in papers which anyone can use to learn from - if people on the left weren't so performative and lazy we could have our own ai too

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

I studied computer science in university. I know how computer science works.