this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
334 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2521 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 71 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The crux of it is

'If X owned the data, it could perhaps argue it has exclusive rights to control the data, but then it wouldn't have safe harbor.' if you own it you don't get section 230 protection.

This judge is also the one who stomped Oracle, in Oracle vs Google

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Interesting, didn’t know that about the judge! Or maybe I just skimmed that part of the article lol