Codeberg was asking about this. The linked toot by a commenter points to :

SEqlite

These are CC-BY-SA 4.0 remixes of the Stack Exchange Creative Commons Data Dumps. 100% Unendorsed by Stack Exchange, Inc.

They are minimal. They provide the data you probably care about and the data you need to comply with the original license in SQLite format.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They have already access to SO's CC content, why would they get it from the fediverse?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They already have it.

I said alternative to SO. As in, likely, a place to post new content (answers, comments). Nothing can really be done with the content OAI already got their hands on other than firing off a few well-placed EMP bombs.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but you mentioned importing old content is problematic, and I don't see why?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Because to import old content, you have to respect the old license (or get every contributor of back-then to relicense). That would mean having a site with contents under differing licenses depending on date, which is something the corpos can use as an excuse to continue siphoning everything without consequence.

I'm fine with a mirror / archive of SO. But it shoudl very definitively be a different thing than an active SO alternative, and their users and data storages should be also different.