this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
52 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17934 readers
93 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I currently use TinyWall Firewall, it works very well, it's small/portable, no complaints I even donated to the Dev but I would really prefer open source, also it needs to be user friendly like TinyWall so my non-tech family members can/will use it like they do with TinyWall.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Templa@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This is Beehaw and we aim to be a nice place, right? So to me is kind of pointless this kind of discussions and I just meant to say that your comment sounded very judgemental and it could be written in a nicer way, that's all.

Edit: Check OP's new comment on the post.

[–] anonymouse@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I disagree that it was judgemental. Sure, it could've been written nicer, but there was no need to - it was just a simple question hinting at the irony of the situation, nothing more, nothing less. I didn't break any rules, and if I did, the mods are free to delete my comment. The fact that they didn't intervene - when they're famously known to rule with an iron fist - proves that your judgment of my comment coming as "very judgemental" is your own opinon.

[–] Templa@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm never said you were violating any rules, I was just expressing my opinion. If a person asks a question you can decide if you are going to be helpful and answer that question or make an statement regarding the irony of their question, which isn't helpful at all.

You keep doing whatever you think it is best.

[–] anonymouse@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

First of all there's no rule that the very first comment to a question has to be an answer, and that it has to be helpful in that instance - there's always the chance that said helpful answer might come further down the chain - had OP replied to the comment.

Sometimes the best answers are born out of asking questions, because often the person asking the question may not be asking the right question (due to not stating all the details, or having incomplete knowledge, misconceptions etc). Regardless, it sparks a discussion, so I don't see the problem, as long as the discussion is taking place in a civil manner and no rules are being broken. Finally, even if the discussion chain that sparked wasn't helpful to OP, it could help someone else. Or at least entertain them. And those who can't be bothered, can always ignore the chain, or even block the person(s) in question. So regardless, I don't see this as a loss or a negative of any sort.

[–] desentizised@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Said like a person that doesn't want to "argue till the end of the universe". Maybe just take the hint once there's multiple people trying to politely tell you the same thing? Prove that you're not just good at fortifying the walls around your bubble. Criticism is rarely meant to attack us. Nobody is accusing you of a crime. I know it's hard to take that step back from one's own perspective.

Again, just because something works for you doesn't mean you have to be evangelical about it. Don't try to be the "I use arch btw" meme for real.

[–] anonymouse@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, I like to argue. But it takes two to tango. If you don't like to participate, just stop replying to me - as simple as that. :)

And please tell me, when was I ever evangelical in this comment thread/comment chain? Please quote the exact statement(s) I used that shows evidence I was trying to be evangelical in this chain.

[–] desentizised@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Look. You can't have it both ways. You can either be the "i use arch (and so should everybody else) btw" guy or you can be dumbfounded by people accusing you of being the "i use arch (and so should everybody else) btw" guy. If you do both (in succession I guess) you're just a parody of your own pro-FOSS message.

I know I'm probably opening another can of worms by saying this but I'm an absolute privacy advocate. And guess what? I use multiple Windows-installations as part of my day-to-day. Yes I do want that number to migrate towards zero but so far, especially when it comes to laptops (and more so laptops with multiple GPUs) I just never saw any appeal in crippling my own experience just for the sake of subjective "freedom".

So now imagine a person like me trying to look for help setting up a Pi-hole installation for the sake of privacy. In comes the evangelical "If you actually truly care about your privacy, why are you using Windows?" Sound familiar? How about helpful (in terms of getting someone closer to a Pi-hole installation)?

[–] anonymouse@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

If you do both (in succession I guess) you're just a parody of your own pro-FOSS message.

When did I do both? Please quote or link the exact messages as evidence.

You also keep associating the term "evangelical" with me, without citing any evidence.

Also, your privacy example isn't quite the same here, since you absolutely can have privacy with Windows - just block all Microsoft domains, use a decent firewall/PiHole/adblock/DNS etc. Or just soft air-gap Windows, allowing only selective traffic to pass thru a manually-configured per-app proxy gateway.

On the other hand, someone asking for FOSS apps and claiming they prefer FOSS, whilst still using Windows, is ironic.