this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
1815 points (96.7% liked)

Lemmy

12524 readers
13 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please. Captcha by default. Email domain filters. Auto-block federation from servers that don't respect. By default. Urgent.

meme not so funny

And yes, to refute some comments, this publication is being upvoted by bots. A single computer was needed, not "thousands of dollars" spent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 102 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Sigh....

All of those ideas are bad.

  1. Captchas are already pretty weak to combat bots. It's why recaptcha and others were invented. The people who run bots, spend lots of money for their bots to.... bot. They have accessed to quite advanced modules for decoding captchas. As well, they pay kids in india and africa pennies to just create accounts on websites.

I am not saying captchas are completely useless, they do block the lowest hanging fruit currently. That- being most of the script kiddies.

  1. Email domain filters.

Issue number one, has already been covered below/above by others. You can use a single gmail account, to basically register an unlimited number of accounts.

Issue number two. Spammers LOVE to use office 365 for spamming. Most of the spam I find, actually comes from *.onmicrosoft.com inboxes. its quick for them to spin it up on a trial, and by the time the trial is over, they have moved to another inbox.

  1. Autoblocking federation for servers who don't follow the above two broken rules

This is how you destroy the platform. When you block legitimate users, the users will think the platform is broken. Because, none of their comments are working. They can't see posts properly.

They don't know this is due to admins defederating servers. All they see, is broken content.

At this time, your best option is for admin approvals, combined with keeping tabs on users.

If you notice an instance is offering spammers. Lets- use my instance for example- I have my contact information right on the side-bar, If you notice there is spam, WORK WITH US, and we will help resolve this issue.

I review my reports. I review spam on my instance. None of us are going to be perfect.

There are very intelligent people who make lots of money creating "bots" and "spam". NOBODY is going to stop all of it.

The only way to resolve this, is to work together, to identify problems, and take action.

Nuking every server that doesn't have captcha enabled, is just going to piss off the users, and ruin this movement.

One possible thing that might help-

Is just to be able to have an easy listing of registered users in a server. I noticed- that actually... doesn't appear to be easily accessible, without hitting rest apis or querying the database.

[–] eyy@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Haven't you heard of the "Swiss cheese" model of security?

The best way to ensure your server is protected is to unplug it from the Internet and put it in an EMF-shielded Faraday cage.

There's always a tradeoff between security, usability and cost.

captchas can be defeated, but that doesn't mean they're useless - they increase the level of friction required to automate malicious activity. Maybe not a lot, but along with other measures, it may make it tricky enough to circumvent that it discourages a good percentage of bot spammers.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I disagree. I think the solution is moderation. Basically, have a set of tools that identify likely bots, and let human moderators make the call.

If you require admins to manually approve accounts, admins will either automate approvals or stop approving. That's just how people tend to operate imo. And the more steps you put between people wanting to sign up and actually getting an account, the fewer people you'll get to actually go through with it.

So I'm against applications. What we need is better moderation tools. My ideal would be a web of trust. Basically, you get more privileges the more trusted people that trust you. I think that should start from the admins, then to the mods, and then to regular users.

But lemmy isn't that sophisticated. Maybe it will be some day, IDK, but it's the direction I'd like to see things go.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

HackerNews does something similar where new users don't have the ability to down vote until they have earned enough upvotes from other users.

We could extend that, and literally not allow upvotes to properly register if the user is too new. The vote would still show on the comment/post, but the ranking of the comment/post will only be influenced by seasoned users. That way, users could scroll down a thread, see a very highly upvoted comment bang in the middle, and think for themselves "huh, probably bots".

Very hierarchical solution, heavily reliant on the mods not playing favourites or having their own agenda.

heavily reliant on the mods

As any solution to this sort of problem should be, IMO.

If the mods suck, then go make another community. If enough of the mods are good, they can be a huge part of the solution. I'm envisioning this:

  1. users report other users
  2. mods ban users based on reports, if the reports have merit
  3. admins block instances based on reports from mods, if the reports are consistent

Transparency keeps the mods honest, or at least allows users in the community to name and shame bad mods.

Some automated tools to help mods out are always welcome.

[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree. I think the solution is moderation.

But- that is basically agreeing with the context of what I said.

So I’m against applications.

I don't like them either, but, the problem is, I don't have ANY other tools at my disposal for interacting with and viewing the other users.

What we need is better moderation tools.

Just a way to audit user activity and comments would be a big start. I honestly cannot find a method for doing this via the UI. Having to resort to querying the database just to dig up details.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I'll work on this. I'm trying to get more involved in lemmy-adjacent dev work, so this might be a fun project.

[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I dug around and built a pretty simple webassembly GUI for lemmy just now-

It would appear, the API is actually missing easy ways to just... query users, and actions. However, skipping past the lemmy api and going directly to the database, is easy enough.

And, from there, its pretty easy to run each user's post history through say, a piece of ML, which detects the potential for spam, and reports on the highest risk users.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how hard that would be to throw into a separate service? We could probably set up a replica of the main db to run the ML algo against and ship it as an optional add-on service.

Admins could then set it to update the model on some schedule and to flag likely spammers/scammers.

Sounds feasible.

[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 2 points 1 year ago

Querying users, is actually extremely easy.

Query users, posts, and then performing sentiment analysis, is also extremely easy.

(From the database- that is)

The API is a bit limited.

I am messing around with the database right now.... and.. well, it maintains a LOT of data.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is all 100% correct. People have already written captcha-bypassing bots for lemmy, we know from experience.

The only way to stop bots, is the way that has worked for forums for years: registration applications. At lemmy.ml we historically have blocked any server that doesn't have them turned on, because of the likelihood of bot infiltration from them.

Registration applications have 100% stopped bots here.

[–] eyy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're right that captchas can be bypassed, but I disagree that they're useless.

Do you lock your house? Are you aware that most locks can be picked and windows can be smashed?

captchas can be defeated, but that doesn't mean they're useless - they increase the level of friction required to automate malicious activity. Maybe not a lot, but along with other measures, it may make it tricky enough to circumvent that it discourages a good percentage of bot spammers. It's the "Swiss cheese" model of security.

Registration applications stop bots, but it also stops legitimate users. I almost didn't get onto the fediverse because of registration applications. I filled out applications at lemmy.ml and beehaw.org, and then forgot about it. Two days later, I got reminded of the fediverse, and luckily I found this instance that didn't require some sort of application to join.

[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 1 points 1 year ago

Don't read the first sentence, and then glaze over the rest.

I am not saying captchas are completely useless, they do block the lowest hanging fruit currently. That- being most of the script kiddies.

[–] alert@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Despite all the hype about these things being able to solve all the worlds problems, they can't answer a series of contextual questions.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Boom. Roasted.

[–] homesnatch@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Captcha is like locking your car... There are still ways to get in, but it blocks the casual efforts.

I review my reports. I review spam on my instance. None of us are going to be perfect.

Do you review upvote bots? The spam is an easily replaceable account, the coordinated army of upvote bots may be harder to track down.