this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
297 points (98.4% liked)

Steam Deck

14894 readers
62 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The cost to maintain "native" ports is too high to make sense for most developers.

PS: Proton also makes it easier to preserve games since an "native" port would become incompatible overtime without work to adapt the software to changes in the system it's running.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The cost to maintain “native” ports is too high to make sense for most developers.

If that was the case, no console ports would exist, except maybe Xbox because Xbox uses modified Windows internally.

Proton also makes it easier to preserve games since an “native” port would become incompatible overtime without work to adapt the software to changes in the system it’s running.

Inform yourself what Steam Linux Runtime is before making such comments. You are 100% wrong.

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If that was the case, no console ports would exist, except maybe Xbox because Xbox uses modified Windows internally.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18845205

[–] proton_lynx@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How fucking idiot would you have to be to complain about users sending bug reports. Linux users usually send very detailed bug reports, which can uncover bugs that might happen on all platforms.

[–] jukibom@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

auto reported crashes

*publisher disables crash reporter*

[–] proton_lynx@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Well, that's even worse. You are auto-generating bug reports and complaining about the users that send those reports 🤦

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yes Linux users generate great reports because they care and usually are more knowledgeable.

But treat the reports cost time and work, and usually this problems will not happen for the majority of their use base.

So, as the company, you can have 0.1% of your sales generating 20% of extra work that will not benefit 99.9% of the users. It is easier and cheaper to cut that group (us Linux users) instead of support.

[–] proton_lynx@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I understand people not wanting to support Linux, that's fine. But complaining like that guy did is just stupid. Complains about auto-generated bug reports from people that play the game and then complains about that same group of people of participating in the forums. 🤦

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He should have complained to the graphics hardware manufacturers and pushed to get them to release more open source drivers for their hardware. Instead, he bitches about Linux instead of the problem root.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Instead, he bitches about Linux instead of the problem root.

  1. Game company funds through Kickstarter.

  2. Game company reaches goal from taking money from Linux users.

  3. Game company releases a shoddy port that crashes

  4. Sales data shows that customers don't wanna buy a separate SKU of a game that crashes all the time

  5. *LInUx bAd!!!*

Also this is a Steam Deck community. It should be obvious that all discussion around native games centers around stable Steam Deck hardware specs, SteamOS, and the Steam Linux Runtime container solution for games released on Steam, not some buggy (and mediocre) game from a literal decade ago released as tar.gz file into the wild.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Ports aren't individual products on Steam.

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip -5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Inform yourself what Steam Linux Runtime is before making such comments. You are 100% wrong.

If a game depends on an API and this API gets discontinued, without adaptation it will have problems. That's true for any software and any system. As a compatibility layer, Proton can keep old games compatible despite the system changes when it translates the API calls that the games depend on to what the base system has to offer. (I'm not talking necessarily of a game running on Steam in this case)

So, enlighten me, where am I wrong?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

So, enlighten me, where am I wrong?

So you're too lazy to read up on Steam Linux Runtimes and expect me to explain it to you? SLR 1.0 Scout keeps full binary compatibility to Ubuntu 12.04, so 12 years already. SLR APIs don't change. That's the point. Get a clue.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You are getting downvoted by people that have no idea how software development and maintence works.

Every feature cost. More than most people realise. Both in development time and to maintain it over time and releases. It all adds up, not saying EA are correct in not supporting it. But to think it is free is just incorrect.

They made a business decision to not support it. We think it is the wrong decision, but it is ultimately theirs to make.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Games made in Unity or Unreal Engine literally do not require any additional effort from the developer aside from choosing Linux as the build target from a drop-down menu. So native Linux ports of UE and Unity games cost virtually nothing.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

You still need to keep supporting it for future releases, make sure it actually works and not just builds, test, update QA pipeline, tell support, etc etc

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

But to think it is free is just incorrect.

Did anybody say that making Linux ports is free? I certainly didn't. I said that native Linux ports lead to a better consumer experience which cannot be denied as seen with the submitted story about the Rally game.

Also Arthur made his obliviousness regarding Steam Linux Runtimes very clear by claiming that they were affected by changing Linux APIs all the time. That claim is just factually wrong.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That seems to be the general atmosphere, "leaving money". They probably analysed it and thought it wasn't worth the effort. Companies like to make money after all.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They probably analysed it and thought it wasn’t worth the effort. Companies like to make money after all.

If all the economic news from the games industry from the last year or so should have taught you anything: No. Shortsighted whims of shareholders are not proper financial analysis. The same people who also concluded years ago that leaving Steam and going exclusively to Origin was a good idea are definitively not the sharpest tools in the shed.

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago

Everybody has the right to be wrong I guess xD