Technology

59446 readers

4475 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

780

Microsoft's carbon emissions up nearly 30% thanks to AI (www.theregister.com)

submitted 6 months ago by QuantumSpecter@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’d love to see any evidence or logical arguments that an inflationary economy is worse than a deflationary one.

Don't you understand that artificially induced unlimited growth is bad? It's not about inflation or deflation, but the outcome.

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/strategy/pricestab/html/index.en.html

The main task of the ECB is to maintain price stability. The ECB’s Governing Council considers that price stability is best maintained by aiming for 2% over the medium term. Price stability creates conditions for more stable economic growth

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I don't disagree with you on that. I didn't think your first comment quite conveyed this nuance, and deflationary economies are terrible for everyone.

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

deflationary economies are terrible for everyone

That's a myth spread by modern monetary theorists because they only understand the economy from an inflationary perspective. Economies worked fine for millennia without inflationary money.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think local economies from millennia ago are similar enough to compare to modern global economies with our current population boom. I think we could for sure have a different approach if our population was stable or decreasing.

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

worked fine for millennia without inflationary money

That means until the early 1900s or 1970s when inflation went into overdrive.

our current population boom

Huh what?

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

That means until the early 1900s or 1970s

What a wide window, but I'd like to point out that the baby boomers generation happened right around this time.

Huh what?

Fertility rates and total population numbers are not the same thing.