Free and Open Source Software

17937 readers

128 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

131

Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men (www.researchgate.net)

submitted 6 months ago by rimu@piefed.social to c/foss@beehaw.org

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's [when their gender is hidden]. However, when a woman's gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 74 points 6 months ago (3 children)

They didn't use very comprehensive research methods. Also they only used Github.

First, from the GHTorrent data set, we extract the email addresses of GitHub users. Second, for each email address, we use the search engine in the Google+ social network to search for users with that email address. Third, we parse the returned users’ ‘About’ page to scrape their gender.

a bias against men exists, that is, a form of reverse discrimination.

How is it reverse discrimination. It's still plain old discrimination. I'm starting to smell a biased research here. Or at least the researchers have a bias.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 31 points 6 months ago

Clearly discrimination is only against woman thus reverse discrimination is against man. /s

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 23 points 6 months ago

any bias that doesn't confirm my bias is reverse bias