this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
63 points (95.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5239 readers
481 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
63
Memo to Joe: Fight a Climate Election (billmckibben.substack.com)
submitted 5 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Cause they can 100% go all in on Chinese corporations if it means they get that cashola.

What does this even mean? They can't form an oligopoly with them, signalling to them to raise prices/cut production to collectively increase profits in the American market like American corporations do.

And if you think Chinese companies aren’t in it for the money themselves

I mean they are, but the big companies also have quotas they have to meet, defined in the 5 year plans, and the gov't is more than willing to shake down the owners/executives if they're too profitable or not productive enough.