this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
289 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
2816 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

archive.is

Shall we trust LM defining legal definitions, deepfake in this case? It seems the state rep. is unable to proof read the model output as he is "really struggling with the technical aspects of how to define what a deepfake was."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

These types of things are exactly what Generative AI models are good for, as much as Internet people don’t want to hear it.

Things that are massively repeatable based off previous versions (like legislation, contracts, etc) are pretty much perfect for it. These are just tools for already competent people. So in theory you have GenAI crank out the boring stuff and have an expert “fill in the blanks” so to speak

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 6 points 5 months ago

True, if the LLM is training on those legal documents. Less true if its trained on whatever random garbage was scrapped out of reddit.

At least this time the Rep. was actually reviewing the output, so thats responsible at least.