this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
881 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2588 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

The Caveat is that it is permanent and irreversible for the average person with very few exceptions.

EDIT: added "for the average person"

[–] TK420@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 12 points 5 months ago

Also why it isn't a replacement for birth control.

[–] cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Another caveat is that it's not allowed for men under 25 in my country (Sweden). "My body - my choice" only applies to one gender lol

edit: Although, to be fair, sterilisation is also not allowed for women under 25. They do ofc have many more options though

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

Exactly, one of the best decisions I ever made

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's actually a pretty high success rate for surgical reversal. Some clinics hitting 90%. Still, not ideal.

[–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Successful reversal meaning they managed to glue the tubes back together. Successful pregnancies are significantly lower afaik

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but how available are those clinics to the average person? I've never looked into it personally, but I assume travel is necessary and costs are out of pocket.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

Absolutely a correct take, I'd say. I know that my insurance would cover it but this is the first time that I've EVER had insurance that would touch anything related to fertility (beyond female birth control) with a 10ft pole. I'd say that it's fair to say that the average person in the US does not have access, mainly due to the awful level of "normal" for healthcare accessibility.

I've looked into it recently, myself. I wanted to see if the snip was an option due to how hormonal birth control impacts by wife. With the desire to still have kids at some point, it's not a sure enough thing currently and is not recommended for people like me ("if you're looking into reversibility, it's probably not for you"). When I last looked a decade ago, success rates were topping out around 60-70%. Advances in surgical technique and technology have really improved things though. If only something like vasalgel would actually see availability - I'm not confident though, after two decades of failure.