this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
        
      
      74 points (83.0% liked)
      Technology
    76562 readers
  
      
      2919 users here now
      This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
 - Only tech related news or articles.
 - Be excellent to each other!
 - Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
 - Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
 - Politics threads may be removed.
 - No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
 - Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
 - Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
 - Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
 
Approved Bots
        founded 2 years ago
      
      MODERATORS
      
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    view the rest of the comments
I agree with your point, but you're arguing that noise can be redundant data. I am arguing that redundant data is not necessarily noise.
In other words, a signal can never be filtered losslessly. You can slap a low pass filter in front of the signal and call it a day, but there's loss, and if lossless is a hard requirement then there's absolutely nothing you can do but work on compressing redundant data through e.g. patterns, interpolation, what have you (I don't know much about compression algos).
A perfectly noise free signal is arguably easier to compress actually as the signal is more predictable.