this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
31 points (80.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5244 readers
273 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
31
Opinion: Climate scientists are finally learning what Indigenous elders like me have been teaching for generations - The Salt Lake Tribune (archive.ph)
submitted 5 months ago by solo@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Zorque@kbin.social 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why go after climate scientists... who have been saying this "for generations"? Climate scientists aren't the problem.

[โ€“] solo@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I could say, understanding a text written by an indigenous author may need of "us"/others some getting used to the language, due to cultural diffrences. So what I got from the text is more like a critic on how climate science is used within capitalism. I don't see an attack on climate scientists.