this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
933 points (95.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21226 readers
86 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] Kyatto@leminal.space 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    If it brings more people and support to the linux ecosystem I say sure, go for it. If more people start using linux, even a corpo version, over windows, doing a "side-grade" is more palatable than a change as severe for most people going from Windows to a FOSS linux, even if it is still unlikely for the non-technically inclined. It may also improve product/software support for linux in general, meaning everyone using linux already would benefit from a mainstream distro existing.

    Assuming of course it isn't a total trainwreck that tarnishes the reputation of linux, but even then, would broaden the awareness and discourse for linux so maybe not all bad regardless.

    My 2 cents anyways.

    [โ€“] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

    Well, it's not like he's already done trainwrecks that tarnished the reputation of multiple companies, so I'm sure we're safe ๐Ÿ˜

    [โ€“] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    I disagree. His involvement includes his circus. I like where Linux is. Circus brings unneeded attention.

    [โ€“] Kyatto@leminal.space 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    that's fair, but if the toddler billionaire found a new block to chew on, I hope it at least brings something good to the overall community.

    [โ€“] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

    You had a good point though. Even if he does make that enshittified distro, people will see through it and probably be like "wait... I though this is what we were running from in the first place ๐Ÿคจ", and that will in turn lead them to other distros.

    Plus the whole traction aspect, more software for Linux, even if it is proprietary, that is what actually keeps users on Windows - their favorite software running natively on Linux.

    So, yeah, I was also like "holy shit, hope he doesn't do anything stupid ๐Ÿ˜ฌ", but you made some fair points, so, I guess... go for it Elon ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿคท ๐Ÿ˜.