this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
19 points (77.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8576 readers
389 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
19
Intel’s new chip could seriously threaten AMD and the Steam Deck (www.pcgamesn.com)
submitted 5 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 22 points 5 months ago

the problem that intel has that the piece doesnt mention is all of intels claims for the most part was intel comparing it against themselves and not their competitors, as intel probably knows that it would look silly vs AMD.

theres clearly stuff being hidden as Intels claiming both gpu performance and power consumption better than previous generation. the problem is, intel previous generation was already by default worse than AMD/TSMC in both fronts, so being better than previous intel only paints part of the picture.

also advertising for raytracing at this performance tier is silly. thats like trying to buy a rtx 3050 for raytracing (you really shouldn't)