Technology

58173 readers

3036 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

881

Microsoft has blocked the bypass that allowed you to create a local account during Windows 11 setup by typing in a blocked email address (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 3 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

267 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why in God's name are you running either of those things on windows?

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought we weren't supposed to kink shame. Maybe /u/Raglesnarf is really into degradation and being dominated. Full on ball-busting, perhaps?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Counter-point; if someone is into degradation specifically, wouldn't they be happy to be kink shamed?

[–] Raglesnarf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

because it was super duper easy to setup and the overhead isn't all that bad for my use case. I am concerned whenever I decide to move/upgrade to something different since my hard drives are in a Windows "Storage pool" or whatever it's called

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In all seriousness, if you're self hosting anything, please learn your way around Docker and Linux. It's a small time investment up front for huge payoffs. You'll get more value out of your hardware, and you'll have a system that's much more reliable (Windows was not built for 24/7 uptime).

[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In fairness, I've had several machines running versions of windows server with lots of uptime and zero stability issues. But the last time I ran a windows server is was advanced server 2003 so....

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Windows Server isn't so bad as a server platform, although it comes with a lot of unnecessary overhead, and its container support sucks. Given that containers are really the way to go with self-hosted services now, that makes Windows Server a poor choice.

But realistically, when most people say they're self hosting on Windows, they mean regular old consumer Windows, which absolutely hates running for extended periods without rebooting. It's just not built for uptime.