this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
65 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

58157 readers
3528 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Go to the latest video on Louis Rossmann’s channel. Check the comment section, they found a loophole

[–] Usually_Lurker@artemis.camp 7 points 1 year ago

"Further, the bill has a component that prevents manufacturers from being required to make tools, parts, and documentation available for any component that would disable or override antitheft security measures, which would encompass features like Face ID."

All Apple has to do is claim that some part is security-sensitive and they don’t have to make it available. Or they can part things together in a “package” and only make that available. Need a $1 chip? Tough, you have to buy the screen sub assembly that costs $750.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

I only see comments claiming they found a loophole and the move was anticompetitive so smaller manufacturers break down.

No sources.