this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
115 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2735 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new artificial intelligence tool accurately predicts certain forms of cancer at least three years prior to a diagnosis::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wahming@monyet.cc -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he means algorithms. And since up to a couple years ago, before AI became the new tech buzzword

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They use machine learning, which is a subset of artificial intelligence. It's not just a buzzword here.

[–] matthewmercury@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Admittedly I’m an amateur, but I consider “automation” to encompass algorithms, heuristics, cron jobs, shell scripts, lambdas, basically anything created to do some steps that we’ve already figured out. As I understand it, machine learning uses statistical algorithms. The article makes the process sound like heuristics, though:

“K-ECAN uses basic information already readily available in the EHR, like patient demographics, weight, previous diagnoses and routine laboratory results, to determine an individual’s risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma,” said Rubenstein.

I wouldn’t consider any of that kind of automation to be “intelligence.” Most of the stuff we currently call “AI” is the best form of automation that we can create right now, but it’s still not AGI.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 1 year ago

I agree with you that machine learning does qualify as AI, and that it applies here. That wasn't the original discussion, though. I was just saying that algorithms did not traditionally qualify as AI, up until the recent trend of calling EVERYTHING AI.