this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
10 points (81.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40041 readers
749 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
10
Question about data available to network management (aussie.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by tuff_wizard@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello this isn't strictly 'selfhosted' material but there seems to be a lot of networking knowledge in this group.

I'm thinking of leveraging my universities network to assist in downloading "Linux ISO's" via torrent. I thought a cool little project would be and old rasberry pi with a battery pack, wifi radio and an external hdd in a box would be cool.

Considering I have to use a university supplied email and password, unique to me, to connect to the wifi (only once then it connects like normal). How obvious will it be that I am downloading "Linux ISO's"? I'd definitely be running a VPN as a base level of privacy.

Also if there is a better community for this please point me in the right direction. Reddit's adds were annoying but it was definitely easier to stumble onto relevant subreddits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] d_ohlin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get that - I was just confused at your "torrents would be detected" comment. I understand using a VPN would be visible and may be against whatever TOS they have.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, torrents without a VPN will be detected. Torrents inside a VPN won't be detected, but the VPN itself will.

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if VPN traffic is on a non-standard port?

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's still VPN traffic and will be detected as such.

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not really, if it's on TCP 443 it will look no different than a typical HTTPS traffic.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's where you're wrong, bucko. A true tunnel over HTTPS, yes, but if you use IPSec on 443 it will still look like IPSec.

And if the org requires a CA cert or agent installation as part of their AUP, they can decrypt the HTTPS tunnel and see it as a VPN.