this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
125 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5843 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

...which is the whole reason for doing the SMR within the natural reservoir and leaving the CO~2~ in there.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We could just give up on the idea that natural gas is “clean.”

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That used to be my thinking, but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited and we need hydrogen. Therefore, methods like the one described in the article as well as ex situ methane pyrolysis are worth investigating.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited

Sooooo money. That's the exception to doing the right thing?

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 1 points 5 months ago

You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we're under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition.