this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
78 points (94.3% liked)

Selfhosted

60482 readers
807 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
78
Selfhosted alternatives to Goodreads? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 2 years ago by NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So I finally broke down and made a very poor purchasing decision and ordered an e-ink writer to be a notepad/e-reader hybrid. Partially so that it is less of a hassle to read books I got from kickstarters and the like while still using the kindle app for the disturbing amounts of money I throw at Amazon.

Historically? I loved goodreads because theoretically I would get good recommendations based on what I liked. In practice, that has never happened but it is still nice to see if I read something in the past. And once I have multiple ebook ecosystems, it will be nice to actually check that rather than spend the first 100 pages wondering if this is familiar.

So any good recommendations? I suspect what I SHOULD do (and will likely start doing more as a self betterment thing) is just put a note in my personal nextcloud every time I finish a book with a quick summary and some thoughts. But having the big database is also really nice.

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Bookwyrm

[–] milan@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 years ago

+1 for bookwyrm

[–] Mr_Lux@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm using Bookwyrm for about a year now, I think.

I really like it and it's federated approach. Even though it has it's issues (multiple different versions of the same book over multiple servers), I still like to track my readings with it and I also love to add a new book to the server to make it available for everyone :-)

So a +1 from me as well :-)

[–] Dendr0@fedia.io 7 points 2 years ago

Saw the headline, came in thinking "I know there's a federated version, but can't remember the name" and BAM! there it is; Abidan in with the save!

[–] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

So. Fucking. Slow.

[–] dan@sffa.community -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only if it was Free Software or at least OpenSource…

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] dan@sffa.community 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No. It's not. It's just a proprietary source-available software. The license is neither Free nor Open.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or organization (the "User") obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to use, copy, modify, merge, distribute, and/or sell copies of the Software, subject to the following conditions:

The conditions they attach are essentially, don't use it for corporate profit or law enforcement.

It's not a BSD license, but if you're an individual you can do whatever you want with it.

[–] dan@sffa.community 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So it does violate some core rules of both FS an OS. Also the text is so full of legal holes which makes it useless in it's goal too. It only prevents good-intent individuals from contributing and acts as a tool in hand of big evil corpurates.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what exactly you consider "core rules" but GPL3 also puts stipulations on how software can be used and who can use it but I doubt you would be complaining about that.

I'm also not a lawyer, but I don't see how a license that says "if you're an individual, do whatever you want" is going to stop someone with good intentions from contributing.

[–] dan@sffa.community 0 points 2 years ago

Software Freedom #0: The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose

Open source criteria #6: The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

By forbidding some entities from using the software, it violates both Free Software and Open Source and makes itself proprietary.