this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
54 points (98.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5239 readers
576 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
54
fellas, is this true? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 5 months ago by pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/climate@slrpnk.net
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrerChicken@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Fellas"? Do you not want any input from non-fellas?

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

fellas are people who are subscribed to this community, i guess?

[–] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean we're not all fellas. No need to refer to a specific gender, right?

[–] grandkaiser@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fellas

Fellows

Followers

Followers of this Lemmy community

Language comprehension is important...

[–] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Avoiding casual misogyny is also important. You should avoid using gendered language like that when there's really no need.

[–] grandkaiser@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Usage of gendered language isn't inherently casual misogyny. For it to be misogynistic, it must actively harm or belittle women. While I fundamentally agree with reducing gendered language where possible (as I am a NB gender abolitionist myself), I don't think a silly meme on Lemmy is worth getting overly concerned about. It makes the whole movement look pedantic.

[–] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It may not be intentional, not plenty of women feel harmed, belittled, and ignored by the use of language like that. So we should stop using it. It doesn't add anything, and it does, in fact, harm people.

And for the record, it's not the meme, it's the title of the post. I just think that making the explicit or implied assumption that you're talking to a bunch of dudes whenever you post online is just not helpful, that's all.

[–] grandkaiser@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It may not be intentional, not plenty of women feel harmed, belittled, and ignored by the use of language like that. So we should stop using it. It doesn’t add anything, and it does, in fact, harm people.

I understand your concern about the unintentional harm that gendered language can cause. While it's true that language can affect people in non-obvious ways and I support the idea of being mindful of our words and reducing gendered language where possible, I also think it's important to balance this with context and intent.

And for the record, it’s not the meme, it’s the title of the post

The title is a spin on the "Fellas, is it gay...." meme