this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
41 points (95.6% liked)

British Columbia

1837 readers
19 users here now

!britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca

News, highlights and more relating to this great province!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The case specifically wasn't a good step. This is giving religion additional powers and privileges compared to non-religious beliefs.

It said if you say that you don't eat meat because [any reason that doesn't involve a magical immortal being] they won't accommodate, but they would need to accommodate for religion.

Accommodate everyone, or accommodate no one.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

That’s why more needs to be done

In Canada you’re free to have beliefs in private, not public

There shouldn’t be religious accommodations