Socialism

5184 readers

37 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

dessalines@lemmy.ml

Name one successful communist nation! (media.mas.to)

submitted 4 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Again, we're comparing to the incarceration rate today.

There are 2 million people in the nation’s prisons and jails—a 500% increase over the last 40 years. Changes in sentencing law and policy, not changes in crime rates, explain most of this increase. These trends have resulted in prison overcrowding and fiscal burdens on states to accommodate a rapidly expanding penal system, despite increasing evidence that large-scale incarceration is not an effective means of achieving public safety.

https://www.sentencingproject.org/research/

https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2024.html

https://nicic.gov/resources/nic-library/all-library-items/growth-incarceration-united-states-exploring-causes-and

And on intelligence, even if you completely disregard the judicial vulnerability, the US surveillance agencies still hold far less domestic power than the KGB’s domestic cell.

I refuse to believe that anybody could be stupid enough to genuinely think this.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Where is the incarceration rate? People getting held pre-trial is a problem, yes, but even then, the gulag held 2.5 million at their height in the 1950s, and that's not even counting anyone pre-trial or adjusting for the population difference between 1950s Soviet Union and modern day USA.

I am comparing to the incarceration rate today. In 2022, the incarceration rate was 700 per 100,000. Unless you have evidence that that rate more than doubled in two years, I don't see how the US has a higher incarceration rate.

Call me stupid all you want, do you still think incarceration vs. correctional supervision is splitting hairs?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the gulag held 2.5 million at their height in the 1950s, and that’s not even counting anyone pre-trial or adjusting for the population difference between 1950s Soviet Union and modern day USA

These numbers have been challenged by many scholars, Parenti does a great job dissecting these claims in Blackshirts and Reds. You basically cherry pick the numbers you want for USSR while downplaying the numbers in US to make your argument.

Call me stupid all you want, do you still think incarceration vs. correctional supervision is splitting hairs?

I think that you're intentionally playing with the numbers to make your argument work.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fine, we are both picking figures. If you think the numbers I gave are wrong, give me sourced numbers about the same thing that are right.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Chapter 5 here, references at the end of the book, can also read chapter 6 showing how incarceration rate jumped up dramatically after transition to capitalism https://welshundergroundnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/blackshirts-and-reds-by-michael-parenti.pdf

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Soviet police archives and were able to establish well-documented estimates of prison and labor camp populations. They found that the total population of the entire gulag as of January 1939, near the end of the Great Purges, was 2,022,976.[3]

[3] By way of comparison, in 1995, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the United States there were 1.6 million in prison, three million on probation, and 700,000 on parole, for a total of 5.3 million under correctional supervision (San Francisco Chronicle, 7/1/96).

I don't think labor camps and prison are comparable to probation and parole. Do you still want to include probation and parole? If not, I think we can safely conclude that the Soviet Union was much more authoritarian. (If you adjust it by capita, you'd have a US prison population of 1.03 million Soviet heads, which is only a few ten thousands more than half the Soviet population.) If yes, why?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As I've already stated repeatedly, I see exclusion of parole completely arbitrary. You could argue that it's not equivalent certainly, but you can't just dismiss it. And again, we're comparing peak incarceration rate in USS right after the revolution with incarceration in US when its functioning regularly. The fact that USSR numbers drop significantly over time while US numbers do not, is what's really key here.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

As I've already stated repeatedly, I see exclusion of parole completely arbitrary. You could argue that it's not equivalent certainly, but you can't just dismiss it.

All you've said about it before was that you thought it was "splitting hairs" once. What do you suppose we do with probation then? Is there a Soviet purge-era equivalent with a measure we can compare?

we're comparing peak incarceration rate in USS right after the revolution with incarceration in US when its functioning regularly

Well, that's what we sought to compare. Both you and EgoCom claimed stuff like "US incarceration rate is higher than what USSR had during Stalin's purges".

The fact that USSR numbers drop significantly over time while US numbers do not, is what's really key here.

It's hard to have numbers drop a frick ton when you've had no arbitrary purging of ideas that led to gulag-levels of arrests.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

We're just going in circles here, and it's pretty clear that we're not going to convince each other of anything. So, I'm going to leave it at that. Have a good day.