this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
231 points (92.0% liked)

science

14350 readers
134 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (16 children)

Extrovert. Not extravert. Source: am introvert.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 60 points 2 months ago (9 children)
[–] Audalin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is not to say that Jung wasn't a genius. Jung was THE BOMB DIGGIDITY (which, by the way, I wish was an official term in the Oxford dictionary).

If they love Jung so much (which I agree they should because Jung was amaaaaazing), why don't they honor him by using the spelling he actually used?

Love etymological articles with unreliable narrators.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Unreliable narrators keep us all in check, they make us question what we believe or know to be true.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)