this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
1182 points (98.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21192 readers
519 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

    ~~51 years~~ 8 seconds

    $ systemd-analyze
    Startup finished in 2.277s (firmware) + 1.145s (loader) + 1.644s (kernel) + 3.211s (userspace) = 8.279s 
    graphical.target reached after 3.211s in userspace.
    
    $ lscpu | awk -F '  +' '/^ *M.* n/ {print $1, $2}'
    Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3517U CPU @ 1.90GHz
    
    $ vmstat -s | awk -F '^ +' '/[0-9]* K t.* m/ {print $2}'
    3901984 K total memory
    [–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    2s in firmware??? I'm used to at least 30s

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
    [–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)
    [–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    I wonder if more memory still increases post time even on modern computers that don't do a full test on every boot. I feel like I've noticed faster post on computers with less ram compared to ones with more but I haven't gotten around to actually testing changing the amount on the same computer

    [–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

    I think my BIOS has a setting to skip that part