this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
835 points (92.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21192 readers
925 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    835
    No Mercy (files.catbox.moe)
    submitted 4 months ago by sag@lemm.ee to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    162 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    Can you elaborate? I am not an OS design expert, and I thought microkernels had some advantages.

    Many people think that microcernels are only way to run one program on multiple machines without modyfing them. Counterexample to such statement is Plan 9, which had such capability with monolithic kernel.

    [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    That's not something I ever associated with microkernels to be honest. That's just clustering.

    I was more interested in having minimal kernels with a bunch of processes handling low level stuff like file systems that could be restarted if they died. The other cool thing was virtualized kernels.

    [–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

    Well, even monolithic Linux can restart fs driver if it dies. I think.